For years, industry leaders have been encouraging L&D to align itself to business and to measure and report on the impact of learning. We must admit, we spend lots of time on that soap box ourselves.
But if we take the latest ATD learning measurement survey as an indication, the profession has made no progress in measuring results or ROI. The study, conducted in 2015, actually showed decreases in those measurements since 2009.[1] It also shows us that most organizations still measure at Kirkpatrick levels 1 and 2. Only 36% of respondents said their evaluations were "helping to a large extent with meeting organizational business goals."
Why so little progress? The world of HR data analytics, including L&D, has become one of haves and have-nots. Big companies developed in-house analytics teams an iron consulting companies, while many others waited on the sidelines for analytics to become viable for them.
Analytics vendors jumped into the market, but most organizations still sat by waiting for industry leaders to prove the value of a significant investment in HR analytics. Vendors responded by working with HR analytics software vendors to embed their analytics engines into cloud HR platforms. Thus was born the idea of the “democratization of data.”
The advent of embedded analytics created a new wave of hype, and in the last two years or so we have seen some progress, but the number of organizations that come to us looking to span the gap between analytical tools and usability continues to grow. Embedded tools are a far cry from a robust library of reports and visualizations, and many companies find they just don’t have the resources or the expertise to build them.
A host of conflicting agendas contributes to what Tracey Smith, author of many books on analytics, calls a fractured HR analytics world. She explains that with data scientists pulling in one direction and vendors in another, with some people advocating for regulation and publication of HR data and others clamoring for certifications in HR analytics, practitioners have lost focus. Smith encourages us to overcome this with focus and prioritization.
We wholeheartedly agree. We find, in our practice, that those issues melt away when we focus on the needs of internal customers. When you are trying to help the operational leaders in your business get better results, it doesn’t matter that data scientists think you need a Ph.D. to do analytics and vendors believe analytics ought to be for everyone. Nor does it matter that regulators and social scientists disagree on what information we should be collecting and how public it should be.
If you been a learning professional for longer than a few minutes, you know about “smile sheets,” the feedback forms we like to use at the end of an instructor led training course. Their purpose is to capture learner reaction at level 1 of the Kirkpatrick measurement model.
E-learning and SCORM standards have enabled us to take that simple tool and make learning assessments useful, and xAPI shows promise in enabling measurement of any type of learning. Every modern LMS has the tools to push out assessment questionnaires at any point in the learning cycle. We can create assessments to evaluate what takes place post-learning and whether formal or informal on-the-job learning is reinforcing classroom or online training. And we can request feedback from anyone at any time.
With that in mind, here a few recommendations for assessing the impact of learning on the business.
If you follow these steps, you will have all the data you need to show the impact of learning on performance and will be able to use the visualization tools in your LMS embedded analytics to show the result.
Creating those visualizations starts with asking the right questions. Here is a sample to get you started:
We hope we have shown here that you can measure the impact of learning without investing in more expensive technology. You can use the tools you have to get an excellent idea of how your learning and support programs are impacting business performance.
References:
1. "ATD Research Presents - Evaluating Learning: Getting to Measurements That Matter." ATD. April 2016.
2. Thalheimer, Will. Performance-focused smile sheets: a radical rethinking of a dangerous art form. United States: Work-Learning Press, 2016.